Feb 24, 2016
My comments –
AT THIS POINT, there would be a mistrial for juror poisoning, and to discuss details of a crime before a trial would be grounds for misconduct by the DA. God forbid they said something that causes evidence not to be admissible, and then the city would be responsible and held accountable in the WRONGFUL DEATH SUITS that would then be filed by the families of those claimed murdered. WHAT A JOKE. No lawyer in the face of the planet WHEN DEALING WITH A CASE THAT INVOLVED PEOPLE BEING KILLED would make comments as per the details of the investigation before the verdict rendered. I’m sorry, I have no comment per this case due to it still pending a judge’s decision. No questions at this time, please. THAT would be what you would hear if the case were real.